Re: CTE bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: CTE bug?
Date
Msg-id 20090909191638.GB8540@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CTE bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CTE bug?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 03:00:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > Should the outer query be able to reference further-in CTEs?
> 
> No, why would you expect that?

No particular reason, I suppose.  I'm not clear on what the standard
says about this.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types