Robert Haas escribió:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > But trying to VACUUM FULL that table is going to be horridly painful
> > too, and you'll still have bloated indexes afterwards. You might as
> > well just live with the 50% waste, especially since if you did a
> > full-table update once you'll probably do it again sometime.
> >
> > I'm having a hard time believing that VACUUM FULL really has any
> > interesting use-case anymore.
>
> What if your large table doesn't have an index? Then there's no way to cluster.
But there's nothing saying we cannot provide a version of CLUSTER that
does not follow any index and just copies the live tuples.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
