Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:59 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > >> Per the above, it would not. ?It would make things worse. ?This has been
> > > >> true at every other OSS project I've seen documented (disastrously so
> > > >> with MySQL); there is no reason to believe that Postgres would be any
> > > >> different.
> > > >>
> > > >> I also do not see why you are so resistant to the idea of documenting a
> > > >> tracking the post-CF steps so that we can get more people on them.
> > > >
> > > > Huh, who has asked for a list from me? ?This entire post is mostly
> > > > over-the-top and not worth responding to.
> > >
> > > OK, I so request. :-)
> >
> > What do you want to know? Would someone post exactly what question I
> > have not answered in the past?
>
> This is a fair point. I bet 10 bucks that a lot of the questions that
> would be asked would be answered with, "check the archives".
>
> Didn't we do a release wiki page at one point?
Yes, we have a wiki for open items for the current major release.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
