Greg Stark wrote:
> It looks like the row *was* updated by transaction 6179 and the new
> version was stored in line pointer 12. However it's marked
> XMAX_INVALID which means at least somebody at some point thought 6179
> had aborted and marked that hint bit.
Hmm, but LP 12 shouldn't have len=0 then, no? Unless it has been
clobbered by vacuum or HOT pruning, I guess ...
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
