On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> > On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very
> >> serious.
> >
> > Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
> > expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
> > expressions. So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
> > integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.
>
> +1
+1
-dg
--
David Gould daveg@sonic.net 510 536 1443 510 282 0869
If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.
