Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Date
Msg-id 200908120155.n7C1tdI11133@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I compared 8.3 CVS against 8.4 CVS and see the removal of a column in
> > pg_amop.h for exacly the lines you listed:
> 
> Ah.  The removal of amopreqcheck was so long ago I'd forgotten about it ;-)
> Yeah, the column additions/removals since 8.3 would give pgindent an
> excuse to fiddle with the whitespace here.

And all it needs is an excuse.  ;-)

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: dependencies for generated header files