Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 19:04, Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 August 2009 17:33:40 Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't think there'd be much logical difficulty in having an output
> >> field (ie, CSV column or log_line_prefix escape) that represents a
> >> classification of the PID, say as "postmaster, backend, AV worker,
> >> AV launcher, bgwriter, ...". ?It would only require changing things
> >> in one place, whereas your original proposal seemed mighty open-ended.
> >
> > You might be able to achieve that if you use the %q escape and put something
> > after the %q that you can search for.
>
> You could do part of it, but you could still not differ them from each
> other. And really, it seems very much like a kludge to me. I'd rather
> have a "proper field" for it.
Is this a TODO?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
