Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> > We could stop doing that
> > once we have all the user tables in place --- I don't believe it's
> > necessary to preserve the OIDs of user indexes. But we need to
> > preserve toast table OIDs, and toast table index OIDs too if those
> > are created at the same time they are now (else we risk one of them
> > colliding with a toast table OID we want to create later).
>
> It seems harder to come up with a general purpose syntax to support the
> feature in case of toast tables, though.
There's already general purpose syntax for relation options which can be
used to get options that do not ultimately end up in
pg_class.reloptions. An existing example is WITH (oids). One such
option could be used here.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
