Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date
Msg-id 200907242324.29165.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Friday 26 June 2009 12:07:24 Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
> Included is a conceptual patch to use intptr_t. Comments are welcome.

After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts 
whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the 
definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like 
this.

Now I see that you call this a "conceptual patch".  Perhaps we should wait 
until you have developed it into a complete patch?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: When is a record NULL?