Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sam Mason
Subject Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)
Date
Msg-id 20090723140331.GA5407@samason.me.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: comparing NEW and OLD (any good this way?)  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:45:36PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks

Just had a quick flick through your list and one of the early ones stuck
out:


http://www.postgres.cz/index.php/PostgreSQL_SQL_Tricks#Attention_on_IS_NULL_and_IS_NOT_NULL_operators_for_composite_types

is scary; even worse is that it was changed to be like this in 8.2
because the standard says it should behave this way.  What on earth were
they thinking when they defined the standard this way?

--
  Sam  http://samason.me.uk/

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with pg_restore?
Next
From: Sam Mason
Date:
Subject: Re: problem with pg_restore?