Re: Sampling profiler updated - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Sampling profiler updated
Date
Msg-id 200907211613.41673.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sampling profiler updated  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Responses Re: Sampling profiler updated  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 09:09:54 Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> >  * Is it ok we have two versions of profiling? (this and dtrace  
> > probes)
>
> Can't comment on this, never used dtrace before, don't have a version  
> of it on my production systems.

Well, the objection remains: We already have dtrace support, and dtrace or 
dtrace-like systems are spreading to many operating systems, so one wonders 
whether it is useful to clutter the code with another probing system instead 
of putting some resources, say, into getting systemtap up to speed.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/tiny rev.2193
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: git revisited