Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Date
Msg-id 20090715162857.GJ4551@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator  (Jamie Fox <jfox@directcommerce.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator  (Jamie Fox <jfox@directcommerce.com>)
pg_migrator 8.4.1 alpha 1 released with bug mention  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jamie Fox wrote:

> Hi -
> REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> 
> This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working again -
> now to see how vacuumlo likes it.

So did it work?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: hot standby - merged up to CVS HEAD
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07