Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Date
Msg-id 200907132238.n6DMcDZ08620@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Jamie Fox wrote:
> 
> > > I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the pg_restore
> > > version the Rows (estimated) is 316286 and Rows (counted) is the same, in
> > > the pg_migrator version the Rows (counted) is only 180507.
> 
> > Wow, I didn't test large objects specifically, and I am confused why
> > there would be a count discrepancy. I will need to do some research
> > unless someone else can guess about the cause.
> 
> Maybe pg_largeobject is not getting frozen?

That would explain the change in count, but I thought we froze
_everything_, and had to.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha release process