Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date
Msg-id 20090702151759.GB4698@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>  
> > so the new minimum supported version would probably be 2.5.33
> > (2.5.31 was kinda broken for other reasons, and there was no
> > 2.5.32).
> > 
> > Since 2.5.33 is now over three years old, this does not seem like an
> > onerous requirement, but I thought I'd better ask if anyone has an
> > objection?
>  
> You'd be causing problems for SuSE Enterprise users, like us:
>  
> kgrittn@CCDEV-DB:/etc/init.d> cat /etc/SuSE-release
> SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
> VERSION = 10
> PATCHLEVEL = 2
> kgrittn@CCDEV-DB:/etc/init.d> flex --version
> flex 2.5.31

Keep in mind that if you build from a tarball, the lexer has already
been run elsewhere and you don't need flex.  Since you do some
experimental playing from CVS I guess you could install flex from source
in your environment only ...

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: First CommitFest: July 15th
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5