Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 15:37 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > Just keep re-asking until you hear no objections. That will make it
> > > fair. Make it seem as if there is the only one person with an objection,
> > > when others have already agreed.
> >
> > Dude, other people objected on specific counts. That is, there were
> > specific things they objected to, rather than the whole idea. Then,
> > just like code, we do a "here it is with that specific thing fixed. Is
> > it OK now?"
> >
> > I've got that *you* don't like the whole idea. I don't have that
> > definitely from *anyone* else (except maybe Gavin, and I'm still not
> > clear on what his response means), and quite a few people said they
> > liked the idea -- in fact, the majority who have spoken up on this list.
>
> >From your response, I think you'll just keep trying to isolate my
> opinion until it seems frantic and somehow strange. Calling me dude, or
> asking me to chill, is a well-known gambit to make my views seem
> emotional, rather than rational. What's the rush? Why so quick to
> silence me?
The fact I could have predicted this reaction from Simon says something
too.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
