Yes, you are right. I thought that they were absolute function
counts. The data makes more sense now.
Regards,
Ken
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 07:03:34PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu> wrote:
>
> > What is not clear from Stefen's function listing is how the 8.4
> > server could issue 33% more XLogInsert() and CopyReadLine()
> > calls than the 8.3.7 server using the same input file.
>
> I thought those were profiling numbers -- the number of times a timer
> checked what was executing and found it in that method. Which
> suggests that those two methods are probably slower now than in 8.3.7,
> at least in some environments.
>
> -Kevin
>
