Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Date
Msg-id 200906181655.31066.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Saturday 06 June 2009 16:21:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Now that pg_migrator is in beta
> > (http://pgfoundry.org/frs/?group_id=1000235), I was wondering if we want
> > to mention pg_migrator anywhere in our docs or release notes?  Josh
> > Berkus is already mentioning it in the draft press release.
>
> Having gotten no replies I assume we don't want to mention pg_migrator
> in the release notes or documentation, which is fine.  It is mentioned
> in the press release.

Will you eventually want to ship pg_migrator in contrib?  If so, then 
documentation will be added when that happens.

If not, we should add a link somewhere where the upgrade process is described 
(installation instructions, I think).

The makefile for pg_migrator currently assumes by default that it is located 
under contrib/.  Which confuses me.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Named transaction
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backend: compare word-at-a-time in bcTruelen