Re: pgindent run coming - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pgindent run coming
Date
Msg-id 200906131613.53870.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgindent run coming  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgindent run coming  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:54:41 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> >>> I think it usually does that already ...
> >
> > Um, attached you will find a bunch of counterexamples.
>
> At a quick look, I'm not sure that any of these are in code that hasn't
> been edited since the 8.3 pgindent run.

So what does that mean then?  Surely pgindent doesn't keep track of what has 
been edited when?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent run coming