On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:51:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's the new implementation. Depending on unspecified implementation
> details is a good way to have broken code.
i'm not sure if it's good change. there might be perfectly good reasons
to increment idx from within loop.
Best regards,
depesz
--
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/depesz / blog: http://www.depesz.com/
jid/gtalk: depesz@depesz.com / aim:depeszhdl / skype:depesz_hdl / gg:6749007
