Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>
> > Well, that code isn't even correct I think; you're not supposed to
> > modify a GUC variable directly. I think you should just silently
> > use a naptime of at least X without changing the nominal GUC variable.
> > And definitely without the WARNING --- that's nothing but log spam.
>
> Glitches fixed in this version; will apply shortly to 8.3 and HEAD.
Committed.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
