Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples
Date
Msg-id 20090608144010.GD5598@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Robert Haas escribi�:
> >> Maybe we should just have a GUC to enable/disable
> >> partial vacuums.
> 
> > IIRC you can set vacuum_freeze_table_age to 0.
> 
> That has the same effects as issuing VACUUM FREEZE, no?

As far as I can make from the docs, I think it only forces a full table
scan, but the freeze age remains the same.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator issue with contrib
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator issue with contrib