Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 20090601190440.GG5716@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió:

> An
> alternative was to not have BEGIN/END but instead a GUC variable that
> you can SET to the name of the extension currently being added to.
> (The main advantage of that is that the state isn't hidden, but easily
> checkable via existing commands.)

With the CREATE EXTENSION you could still have a read-only GUC var
"current_extension" or so.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path improvements
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_standby -l might destory the archived file