Re: Win32 link() function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Win32 link() function
Date
Msg-id 200906010343.n513h5L19898@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 link() function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Win32 link() function  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> AFAIK hard links simply don't exist on Windows.
> 
> > Magnus showed me this:
> >     http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa363860(VS.85).aspx
> 
> Hmm, interesting.  Are we requiring our DBs to be on NTFS already?

I think we require NTFS with the installers but you can install the
source on anything:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_%26_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows#Can_I_install_PostgreSQL_on_a_FAT_partition.3FFor
thisreason, the PostgreSQL installer package will not initialise adatabase cluster on anything but an NTFS partition.
Theserver andutilities may be installed on any partition type. 
 

> What are the implications for Cygwin?

No idea.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 link() function
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type