Re: search_path vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: search_path vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 200905291308.15564.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: search_path vs extensions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: search_path vs extensions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday 28 May 2009 02:57:00 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Personally, if we're tracking stuff through special dependancies which
> pg_dump will be aware of anyway, I don't see why extension objects
> should go into a special schema.

But they clearly have to go into *some* schema, and it would add some clarity 
to the world if we made a recommendation which one that is.  Which is what 
some of the subproposals really come down to.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions