Re: Dtrace probes documentation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Re: Dtrace probes documentation
Date
Msg-id 20090528232039.GD15201@eddie
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Dtrace probes documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Dtrace probes documentation
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 06:28:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes:
> > The dtrace probes documentation [1] spells each probe name with dashes
> > ("transaction-start", "transaction-commit", etc.). Yet as far as I can see,
> > dtrace only works if you spell the probe names with double underscores
> > ("transaction__start", "transaction__commit", etc.). Why the discrepancy?
>
> Read 26.4.3 and .4.  I don't know why they have this bizarre set of
> conventions, but the single-hyphen version is the spelling
> most visible to end users.

I thought it might be something like that. I've been playing with SystemTap,
and found that only the double-underscore version works for ... well, anything.
See http://blog.endpoint.com/2009/05/postgresql-with-systemtap.html for
details. Perhaps it's worth noting in the documentation that SystemTap users
will need to use the double-underscore version?

- Josh / eggyknap

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions