On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 03:39:39PM +0100, Howard Cole wrote:
> Sam Mason wrote:
> >Note that when used on the pg_dump process all you're doing is stopping
> >it from writing out the backup. The server process will still be
> >running and waiting for the backup to finish writing the data. It will
> >thus hold the transaction open and any other state needed to keep things
> >going. This should be fine for temporary pauses, but it wouldn't be
> >recommended to pause the backup for days at a time.
>
> Just curious.... why would you want to pause a backup/restore?
Yes, it seems a little perverse. There seem to be valid use cases,
disk/cpu time need temporarily elsewhere being one. As the poem goes;
"ours not to reason why"... (hum, I think it's supposed to be "theirs
not to..", ah well).
--
Sam http://samason.me.uk/
