Re: Archives policy - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Archives policy
Date
Msg-id 200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Archives policy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Archives policy
List pgsql-www
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> > Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please?
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy
> 
> Hmm, the first section suggests that there are cases where we will
> de-archive messages, and then the second lays out all the reasons
> why we won't and why it's useless to ask.  So I'm still confused
> what the policy is.  I would be happy with a policy that says
> "The archives are graven on stone tablets.  Don't bother asking."
> but if we are willing to editorialize in extreme cases then maybe
> the second part needs to be modified.

I didn't say it earlier but I agree with Tom that the text is much too
verbose.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Archives policy
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Archives policy