Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date
Msg-id 20090414191146.GS16310@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:52:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> > > I think it's good to have them translatable.  As for using
> > > "aggregate" instead of "agg" I don't think it's that great an
> > > idea.  If you need to notify translators that "agg" stands for
> > > "aggregate", add a /* translator: */ comment.
> > 
> > Where would I add that?  First mention, each time, or...?
> 
> Is there more than one mention of "agg"?

It's in 3 branches in describe.c.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world