Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data
Date
Msg-id 200904111952.32434.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Crash in gist insertion on pathological box data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:29:02 Tom Lane wrote:
> The only question I have is whether we want this nag message or not:
>
> !         ereport(LOG,
> !                 (errcode(ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR),
> !                  errmsg("Picksplit method for %d column of index \"%s\"
> failed", !                         attno+1, RelationGetRelationName(r)),
> !                  errhint("Index is not optimal, to optimize it contact
> developer or try to use the column as a second one in create index
> command")));
>
> I'd be inclined to keep it but reduce it to level DEBUG1 or so.

If it is supposed to be DEBUG1, would you mind if I convert it to an elog so 
it doesn't appear in the translation roster?

Not sure how many responses you will get if you hide the message like that.  
Probably almost anyone would not turn on DEBUG1 unless asked by a developer in 
the first place.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for 8.5, transformationHook