David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 03:12:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > > Tom, It fits into 80 columns if you don't have any functions with
> > > 11 parameters. ;-)
> >
> > Well, yeah, but in typical cases I think it fits. A look at the
> > current regression database shows all but 6 of 117 functions
> > fitting. With another ten characters eaten by a new column, a lot
> > more of them would wrap.
> >
> > > Actually, I'm thinking the new column ought to be called "type".
> >
> > Yes, that's what I had in mind too.
>
> Excellent idea. I just plain don't believe that there's anything
> process-critical and automated that depends on \da, although we could
> have it rewritten as an alias for convenience.
I assume the 'type' column will identify triggers, i/o functions
(cstring), window functions, and maybe aggregates too; this solves
several problems at once.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
