pgsql: Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Subject pgsql: Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer
Date
Msg-id 20090403181743.63F0A754ADE@cvs.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
Add a comment documenting the question of whether PrefetchBuffer should
try to protect an already-existing buffer from being evicted.  This was
left as an open issue when the posix_fadvise patch was committed.  I'm
not sure there's any evidence to justify more work in this area, but we
should have some record about it in the source code.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer:
        bufmgr.c (r1.250 -> r1.251)
        (http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/buffer/bufmgr.c?r1=1.250&r2=1.251)

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Defend against possible crash if a plpython function does not
Next
From: tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Use (unsigned char) cast in argument of pg_tolower().