On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:59:41PM +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 30 mars 09 à 16:52, Bruce Momjian a écrit :
>> I think the big question is whether the inconsistency (pattern implies
>> 'S') is worth accepting for greater usability.
>
>
> My answer is yes, please, definitely, go for it.
> We don't need idiot-proof easy to remember semantics, we need useful
> ones... The former category is already taken care of by some other open
> source database software, have I been told...
>
> What about a mail with some content? Look, a user-level proposal draft!
> :)
> \dt lists user tables only
> \dtS lists system tables only
All of the S ones should probably mean, "include system objects"
rather than "only system objects."
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
