Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >
> >> - "Previously EXPLAIN VERBOSE output an internal representation of the
> >> query plan" -> s/output/outputs/ ?
> >
> > The existing wording seems correct.
>
> I think Bruce's phrasing was in the past tense. It's a bit weird
> because the verb form of "output" is a relatively recent invention and
> the past tense isn't well settled. Dictionaries list both "outputted"
> and "output" as past tense forms. Personally I think Bruce's "output"
> sounds better than the alternative "outputted".
>
> Perhaps "had output" would be clearer?
Excellent idea; done.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
