Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > [ typedef lists ]
>
> Hmm ... the windows members are claiming that "int", "char", "float",
> "double" etc are typedefs, which doesn't exactly match up with my
> mental model of C.
I don't think this is a problem, because the whole point is telling
indent what names should be considered type names, which of course those
should all be.
> On the other hand, dungbeetle is failing to report
> a whole bunch of typedefs that it should report, for example
> AfterTriggerEventDataOneCtid which comes from entirely non platform
> specific code in commands/trigger.c.
This was probably optimized out by the compiler.
I tend to think that having this list is much better than no list at all
(the current situation), and it's better than the old list we used to
have.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
