Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> >>> 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have
> >>> toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users?
> >>> ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored
>
> >> You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored.
> >> Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
>
> > Any takers here?
>
> I tend to think this isn't a very good idea. It's difficult for
> applications to know whether a toast table will be created or not.
> They should be able to just set the toast options and not worry.
The problem is where do we store the options?
