Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
> > I tested this changes and found two issues:
> >
> > 1. fillfactor.* options are silently ignored when the table doesn't have
> > toast relation. Should we notice the behabior to users?
> > ex. NOTICE: toast storage parameters are ignored
> > because the table doesn't have toast relations.
>
> You mean "toast.* options"? If so, yes, they are silently ignored.
> Maybe issuing a warning is not a bad idea. Care to propose a patch?
Any takers here?
The second issue has been solved.
Thanks for testing.