Re: Pet Peeves? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Pet Peeves?
Date
Msg-id 200902042320.43257.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pet Peeves?  (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 19:39:42 John DeSoi wrote:
> Somewhat related, it would be nice if columns had a unique identifier
> in the catalog rather than just a sequence number for the table. This
> would make it possible to distinguish between altering a column versus
> dropping/adding when comparing schemas or detecting DDL changes.

It would also make quite a bit of internal code much simpler if pg_attribute
had OIDs.  I'm not sure if the demand for that is high beyond you, though.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Which is best, timestamp as float or integer ?