Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Date
Msg-id 20090130231304.GF8123@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> So, for 8.4:  *if* we included in 8.4 a version of SEPostgres with all
>> features *except* row-level security, would it still be useful to the
>> SELinux community?
>>
>> I think we're just not going to work out the headache-inducing issues
>> around row-level security in time for 8.4, and it seems to me that
>> integrated system-level security labels at the table-and-column level
>> are still very useful, even without row-level security.

I tend to agree that they will be very useful.  I'm not sure there will
be much adoption without row-level in the security community though, to
be honest.  I'd like to see it as part of an overall plan to eventually
do row-level support.  Given the size of this overall work and feature
set, I think it's appropriate to do it in a staged manner regardless.

> Hasn't a plan for this already been posted? See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg02407.php

Sure, that's a plan, but Josh's question is certainly appropriate.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Next
From: Hiroshi Inoue
Date:
Subject: Re: mingw check hung