Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 16:36:50 Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e@gmx.net) wrote:
> > > As one of the earlier reviewers, I think the design is OK, but the way
> > > the implementation is presented was not acceptable, and very little has
> > > been accomplished in terms of reacting to our comments. For example,
> > > where is the SQL row security feature, which should have been designed,
> > > implemented, and committed separately, in the opinion of most
> > > commentaries.
> >
> > Eh? Are you thinking of column-level privileges, which was committed
> > last week?
>
> No.
The point is we would have preferred to see SQL-level row permissions as
a separate patch first; that just didn't happen in this case, and it
makes the discussion a little more complex.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
