Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
Date
Msg-id 20090125212000.GB4138@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane escribió:

> The main question in my mind is whether we should have a turn-off
> feature that is global (GUC) or per-view (reloption).  One difficulty
> with a reloption is that there's no way to set it on a view until after
> you've done CREATE VIEW, whereupon it's too late --- the auto rules
> are already there, and surely the reloption mechanism isn't going to
> know how to make them go away.

Hmm, is there no way to do CREATE VIEW ... WITH (reloption)?  Isn't it
just a matter of another case in opt_check_option?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Emmanuel Cecchet
Date:
Subject: Re: Table Partitioning Feature
Next
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp)