Re: Auto-updated fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Auto-updated fields
Date
Msg-id 200901221233.21340.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto-updated fields  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Auto-updated fields  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 21 January 2009 20:21:41 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Robert Treat wrote:
> > > On Thursday 08 May 2008 00:27:10 Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> > > > David Fetter wrote:
> >
> > Ref: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-05/msg00198.php
> >
> > > > > 1.  Create a generic (possibly overloaded) trigger function,
> > > > > bundled with PostgreSQL, which sets a field to some value.  For
> > > > > example, a timestamptz version might set the field to now().
> > > >
> > > > Having the pre defined triggers at hand could be useful, especially
> > > > for people not writing triggers so often to get used to it but I'm
> > > > really not happy with the idea of magic preprocessing.
> > >
> > > I have a generic version of this in pagila.
> >
> > Now that we have a specific file in core for generic triggers (right now
> > with a single one), how about adding this one to it?
>
> Any progress on this?  TODO?

I think this is a TODO, but not sure who is working on it or what needs to be 
done. The generic version in pagila is perhaps not generic enough:

CREATE FUNCTION last_updated() RETURNS trigger   AS $$
BEGIN   NEW.last_update = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;   RETURN NEW;
END $$   LANGUAGE plpgsql;

It requires you name your column last_update, which is what the naming 
convention is in pagila, but might not work for everyone.  Can someone work 
with that and move forward? Or maybe give a more specific pointer to the 
generic trigger stuff (I've not looked at it before)

-- 
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))