Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> > Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> >> I thought at one point that the direction this was going toward was to
> >> provide the size of the WAL file as a parameter you can use in the
> >> archive_command:
>
> > Hard to beat for performance. I thought there was some technical
> > snag.
>
> Yeah: the archiver process doesn't have that information available.
OK, thanks, I understand now.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
