Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aidan Van Dyk
Subject Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Date
Msg-id 20090102213334.GW12094@yugib.highrise.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Responses Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Has this gone anywhere?  Is the CVS repo safe yet?

a.

> * Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> [081229 09:50]:
> > I had originally sent this mail in April, but it appears to have been blocked 
> > because the attachment was too large.
> > 
> > While we are in the process of dealing with CVS-Git conversion, we should also 
> > apply this fixup to make the CVS repository more sane.
> > 
> > Could someone with write access to the repository files apply this patch?
> > 
> > 
> > Am Dienstag, 1. April 2008 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> > > The problem appears to be that several tags around the time of PostgreSQL
> > > 7.1 are broken or inconsistent.
> > 
> > Here is a patch to bring the REL7_1 tag in line with the released tarball.
> > 
> > The cvsps errors with the REL7_1_BETA* tags appear to be of a different 
> > nature.  I haven't been able to fix those yet.
> 
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@highrise.ca                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Next
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?