Re: Copyright update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Copyright update
Date
Msg-id 200901012028.n01KSp023127@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Copyright update  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Copyright update
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Chernow wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > Greg Stark wrote:
> > > >> Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the  
> > > >> whole source tree considiered one work?
> > > > 
> > > > One work, I assume.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I am not a lawyer, but if its one work, why is there a notice in every source 
> > > file?  ISTM that if it were one work there would only have to be one notice.
> > 
> > Because people often take source files and copy them for use in other
> > projects.
> 
> I think the correct resolution to the question is to ask legal. Yes?

So I can get three different answers?  It is not a priority for me.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Copyright update
Next
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22