On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:19:56AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:25:47AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I think a simplistic solution is to declare the variable volatile.
> >> Would you test that and report back?
>
> > Yes, making oldcontext volatile makes the test pass.
>
> This is a gcc bug and you should report it. Since the variable is
> not assigned within the try-block, volatile marking should not be
> necessary.
Reported as:
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR38660
kurt
