On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 11:06:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > Given that the main (and only sane, IMHO) use for table inheritance is
> > in table partitioning, can we see about deprecating ONLY (in the table
> > inheritance sense) for the next couple of development cycles and then
> > removing it?
>
> No.
>
> 1. It's required by SQL standard.
Well blow me down! I had no idea the SQL standard had this wart in it.
> 2. Just because you don't have a use for it doesn't mean no one does.
Clearly the SQL standards committee does, and their usage controls ;)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
