On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 08:46:15PM -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >> Oracle on the other hand stores the lock information directly in
> >> the data block that is locked, thus the number of locks does not
> >> affect system performance (in terms of managing them).
> >>
> >> I couldn't find any description on which strategy PG applies.
> >
> > None of the above. We're smarter than everyone else.
>
> Which is why Oracle's locks are more scalable than PG's?
You've been talking about your super-secret test which you allege,
quite implausibly, I might add, to have Oracle (8i, even!) blowing
PostgreSQL's doors off for weeks now.
Put up, or shut up.
Regards,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
