On Monday 15 December 2008 15:43:00 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> >> I think this should not return error as the input args here is
> >> timestamp... inputs?
> >
> > In theory yes, but it's currently not that smart.
>
> This is truly horrid. Was that patch *really* ready to commit?
> I noticed some comments added to polymorphism.sql that certainly
> look like there's still a lot of half-bakedness in it.
There is that one case where a call that could be allowed is overly-cautiously
rejected. That only happens if you have a mix of overloading and default
parameters. It's not really half-baked in the sense that it is not
digestible; it's just not the greatest cake yet. It's
improvement-compatible.
