On Saturday 06 December 2008 22:38:29 James Mansion wrote:
> Kurt Harriman wrote:
> > The foremost opposing argument seems to have been that there
> > should be no attempt to alleviate the existing reserved word
> > problem without automatic enforcement to guarantee that never
> > in the future can new occurrences be introduced.
>
> Is there anything in the source that would necessarily preclude using the
> C++ compiler to build *all* the code?
Probably lots, but that's not the problem we are trying to solve here. And
many people are seriously not interested in using C++ for PostgreSQL.
