Hi Alvaro,
Alvaro Herrera [2008-12-05 14:06 -0300]:
> Of course, as is it's not acceptable; the version number should be
> obtained from PG_VERSION or some such.
Right, it has actually been on my long-term wishlist to replace that
patch with an autoconfiscated one with a non-hardcoded version number.
I just didn't do it yet because it was generally rejected when I
proposed it upstream some years ago.
> I am not sure the "libpq5" versioning is best; maybe we don't change the
> API but we could certainly change error messages between versions. I
> think we should keep it as libpq-8.3, like the rest.
Doesn't make much of a difference indeed, I just made it match the
package name. Also, libpq5 built from -8.3 is used with postgresql-8.2
as well.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
